Current detection is the "invisible bottleneck" of design
Current sensors are essential in power equipment designs such as motor control, battery management, EV chargers, and solar inverters.
This component, which is the key to power control, protection, and monitoring, plays an important role that is directly linked to product performance.
In fact, the current sensor market is expanding year by year against the backdrop of advances in electrification and energy conservation.
According to a DATA BRIGE study, the global current sensor market is expected to be valued at US$3.65 billion in 2024 and reach US$12.46 billion by 2032(1).
*1Source: DATA BRIGE "Global Current Sensor Market Size, Share, and Trend Analysis Report – Industry Overview and Forecast to 2032"
However, there is no end to the following voices being heard at the design site:
・Current sensor selection is difficult
- Annoyed by noise and heat
・Overcurrent detection is not possible in time
In fact, current detection is an "invisible bottleneck" that can be difficult to identify during design and can affect product performance.
Comparison of current detection methods
To select the optimal current sensor for your design, it is essential to first understand the features of each method. There are three main methods for current detection.
The method you choose will have a major impact on the overall design balance, including detection accuracy, response speed, heat generation, insulation structure, and size.
Therefore, it is important to select the optimal method depending on the application and design environment.
1. Shunt resistor method
A shunt resistor is placed in the path to be measured, and the amount of current is detected by reading the voltage across the shunt resistor.
2. Electromagnetic core type
The magnetic core is used to collect the magnetic force generated around the path being measured, and the magnetic sensor inside the current sensor detects the amount of current.
3. Electromagnetic coreless system
Without using a magnetic core, the current flowing through the current paths and bus bars on the board is drawn into the IC, and the amount of current is detected by the magnetic sensor inside the current sensor.
Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of each method
Here we will summarize the features of each method from the perspectives of heat generation, size, insulation, detection accuracy, and ease of mounting.
Image of each method
| method | merit | Demerit |
| shunt resistor | ・Simple structure Abundant track record - Low part cost, making it easy to keep costs down ・High measurement accuracy is easily achieved in low voltage and small current applications |
・Heat generation due to current loss is unavoidable, so thermal design and heat dissipation measures are required ・When the current is large, it is difficult to reduce the resistance value while maintaining accuracy. ・Insulating amplifiers and isolators are essential in high-voltage systems, increasing the number of parts and design man-hours. ・Low noise resistance and highly layout dependent when used in switching power supplies and inverters ・Current cannot be detected using bus bars or non-contact methods. |
| With magnetic core | ・No contact measurement, no current loss. Low fever - Easy electrical insulation and easy to apply to high voltage systems ・Easy to detect large currents |
・Since it contains a magnetic core, the size and volume tend to be large ・Design must take into account variations in magnetic cores and temperature characteristics - Easily affected by external magnetic fields, resulting in placement restrictions ・In many cases, it is mainly limited to busbar current detection applications. |
| Magnetic Coreless | ・No magnetic core required Compact and space-saving is possible ・Non-contact measurement eliminates current loss Low fever - Easy electrical insulation and easy to apply to high voltage systems ・Current detection is possible on both bus bars and board wiring - No magnetic hysteresis Easily suppresses the effects of temperature and aging |
・Consider the magnetic field detection position and layout design |
As such, each method has its own advantages, and the method you choose will depend on the design conditions and priorities.
What current sensing challenges do designers face?
Current sensors are important components that affect product performance, but they are also a field that presents many challenges for designers.
Difficult to select
There are multiple types of current sensors, and they must be selected according to the application and environment. However, there is fragmented information available, and many people find it difficult to determine which is best.
・Noise countermeasures are difficult
In designs that handle high frequency environments or large currents, false detections due to noise are likely to occur, leading to control instability and malfunction.
・Heat generation and insulation design is complex
The shunt resistor method inevitably generates heat, requiring heat countermeasures and insulation design, which leads to a more complex design and an increased number of components.
- Slow overcurrent detection
To function as a protective circuit, it must detect overcurrent instantaneously. A delayed response increases the risk of damage to the circuit or components.
- Low degree of freedom in implementation
Sensors with significant size and shape restrictions impose limitations on board layout and housing design, reducing design freedom.
Coreless current sensors give you design freedom
Conventional shunt resistor and magnetic core methods have many limitations, such as heat generation, insulation, and mounting layout.
Coreless current sensors, which detect current without using a magnetic core, have emerged and are attracting attention as an option that breaks through the limitations of the past.
・Noise resistant
The type that supports differential measurement cancels out disturbance magnetic fields, enabling stable detection and preventing false detection even in high-frequency environments.
Low fever
Since current does not pass directly through the sensor, there is almost no heat generation, simplifying thermal design.
・Easy to insulate
The non-contact method using magnetic detection simplifies the insulation design and improves safety.
High degree of freedom in implementation
Many of the sensors are small and thin, and can be flexibly adapted to bus bars and current paths on the board, greatly increasing design freedom.
・Supports overcurrent detection
Some products are capable of high-speed response and can also serve as protection circuits.
These features make coreless current sensors particularly recommended for designers facing the following challenges:
- I'm having trouble with noise in power supply circuits and motor control
- High-precision current detection is required for EV chargers and inverters
- Insulation design and heat countermeasures are required
- Want to increase the degree of freedom in board design?
- I want to implement overcurrent protection
Want to know more about coreless current sensors?
This article summarizes the most common current detection methods and their respective features and challenges.
The next article focuses on Infineon 's coreless current sensors and introduces practical information useful for design, such as the detection principle (differential measurement), implementation points, and product lineup.
If you are looking to optimize your design, be sure to check this out.